I think we are running 3.3 on everything now because of the 'Board in reboot state'. I haven't seen it as a problem any time recently.. but yeah. we have had our fair share of fun. Default configuration of the 'reset' via power cycle is on. Thunderstorm comes through... defaults 100 cpes. That was our mistake for not being careful enough on the stock configuration, but I've never actually had equipment do that to me.
Cold weather bug hit us so hard, it was just stupid. Almost all our APs where bought in that time frame that had the bug. I haven't had GPS problems though, and we do cruise along at ~27v at multiple sites. Joe On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > I love epmp, the same way i used to love ubnt, but this shits getting out > of hand, the distance reading only fluctuates by a half mile or mile, 24 > volts takes your sites down in a winter power outage, never to return > without sun, gps puck is about 50 percent useless, since even when its not > flapping in the wind it doesnt even work half the time, random reboots, now > "board in reboot" , snr being a flat out lie, and this with the ap rssi. Id > bet if they focused their limited codespace on stuff that actually worked, > the line would be better, still not the garbage level of ubnt, but at this > poibt its really striving ti take that crown away > > On Jul 10, 2017 7:00 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, I've seen that a lot. The numbers on the AP used to be pretty >> accurate, but somewhere around v3.0, it went all wacky... I think they may >> have fixed it (or at least improved it) in 3.3 or 3.4, but that particular >> release note could be a figment of my imagination. >> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> They might as well not waste the codespace and memory if its going to >>> have this little value. Or just make it a static number like ubnts fake >>> noise floor >>> >>> On Jul 10, 2017 4:47 PM, "Joe Novak" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> From what I understand Nate is correct. It's calculated AP side. >>>> Ubiquiti has the so called extra info packets they pass back and forth, as >>>> far as I know EPMP does not at this point. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't think it's a value that's passed between the AP/SM, but >>>>> Calculated at the AP based on distance and MSC Level, and probably some >>>>> other things. So the Calc could be off. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/10/2017 11:39 AM, Steve Jones wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I haven't looked on other APs, just dealing with an issue. this is >>>>>> 3.2.2 >>>>>> The AP is showing the downlink RSSI for the SMs 10db or more stronger >>>>>> than the SM is showing it. Is this a known bug? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
