So has anyone heard about 120GHz gear in field yet? Jaime Solorza
On Jul 19, 2017 4:11 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > You luck out because you're so close to me, but I'd recommend everyone > else go through the math to figure it out. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > *To: *"af" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:55:21 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 70/80ghz links > > Thanks Mike, I didn't have a chance to read through that earlier... it > looks like it pretty much confirms what I already thought... 80ghz and > 24ghz should be pretty similar as far as reliability goes. But I'm not sure > if it's going to be possible to figure out if the Metrolinq 2.5 is > realistic option without trying it... but it's cheap enough that it might > be worth while to just pick up a link and throw it up there to see what > happens. > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Earlier I linked to posts helping you do the math to determine how likely >> you'll have how much fade. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"af" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:02:27 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 70/80ghz links >> >> Yeah, I'm aware of the differences between 60ghz and 70/80ghz... I'm >> assuming that it will work (according to Siklu's link budget calculator, I >> should be able to get 99.999% availability). The thing I'm wondering about >> now is if 60ghz will work with the new Ignitenet gear. I'm assuming I would >> have some rain fade issues if it did work, but I might be able to deal with >> that by putting up 24ghz links in parallel... but whether or not messing >> around with all that instead of just going with 80ghz and being done with >> it is another matter. >> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Brian Webster <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> 70 and 80 GHz RF performance is going to be a lot better than 60 GHz. ^0 >>> GHz has a heavy attenuation due to the oxygen molecules being resonant at >>> the frequency, move up high in the spectrum past that resonance and RF >>> performance improves. So don’t necessarily assume if 60 GHz didn’t work 70 >>> or 80 won’t either. 70/80 Ghz is kind of light licensed so you will have to >>> deal with that but it’s not as bad as 11 or 18 GHz. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank You, >>> >>> Brian Webster >>> >>> www.wirelessmapping.com >>> >>> www.Broadband-Mapping.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:15 AM >>> *To:* af >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 70/80ghz links >>> >>> >>> >>> I actually tried using Metrolinqs on half of this link when they first >>> came out, but I was never able to get it to even link... but I'm not sure >>> if the 64.8ghz channel was supported at the time, so maybe it would be >>> different now? >>> >>> I guess a realistic option might be to split the 24ghz link to two hops >>> as well, which should easily get the availability I want, and then bond it >>> to a 60ghz link to add capacity... >>> >>> Speaking of bonding, it looks like the Siklu 2x00 series only has 1Gbps >>> ports... so I'm assuming to get full capacity I would have to bond two >>> ports together? They aren't doing like Ubiquiti and calling 1Gbps full >>> duplex 2Gbps are they? >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
