Yeah... that would be really nice. I think the only Mikrotik routers that currently support a decent voltage range are some of the CCRs and the hEX POE... which isn't bad, but only 5 ethernet ports. Oh, there is at least one CRS that supports 57v, but it's CPU is kind of underpowered for using as a real router (it's similar to the 2011 if I remember correctly).
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > If it only supported 10-60VDC. I hate having to add a DC-DC converter for > one damn device. > > On 7/21/2017 3:40 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > Yup, RB3011 is what you want. > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yep, don’t why I didn’t think of that. The 3011 will fit the bill nicely >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners >> *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 1:36 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] cost effective, mid-range performance Mikrotik >> router needed >> >> >> >> RB3011. Fast, stable (once you upgrade past earlt factory firmware that >> had packet loss bug), $170. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> As we moved all out towers to Fiber / Power up the tower, we still have >> the router at the bottom (running a UBNT S16) at the tower top. The only >> thing we really have at the bottom that plugs into the router (other than >> Fiber) is a SiteMonitor. (Boy, I wish it had an SFP, but I digress.) >> >> >> >> So, we use something like the CRSCRS125-24G-1S (because it was already >> there and has an SFP port) or a RB2011 (same reason). Both have a 600Mhz >> MIPS 74Kc V4.12. >> >> I am looking to find something that has more power without jumping up to >> a $ 380 CCR1009. We have 25+ towers that fit into that scenario. In each >> case, these towers never push for than 50 Mbit of BW but often go over 60% >> CPU. The use Queues per connected customers (that it grabs from Radius) >> and very basic Firewall rules to restrict access on all the good ports to >> our internal office subnet. >> >> >> >> But, we just need a bit more horsepower. Was wondering if someone had >> any ideas? Like maybe building some little cube box to run ROS, but not >> seeing a cost effective solution that has a fiber port and a copper port. >> There is the Power Box pro with same CPU but 800Mhz, but not sure that >> would be the tipping point that we need long term. >> >> >> >> Any suggestions> >> >> >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> Paul McCall, President >> >> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. >> >> 658 Old Dixie Highway >> >> Vero Beach, FL 32962 >> >> 772-564-6800 <%28772%29%20564-6800> >> >> [email protected] >> >> www.pdmnet.com >> >> www.floridabroadband.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
