this are gig e sfp we are having issues with but ive read about fiber sfp on mikrotik too, as we push more bandwith inward and replace the rb with ccr 1072s its just not worth the issues, HP procurve is non problematic plus it gives us options
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > What kind of SFP problem? We haven’t had anything major, been using the > FS.com SFPs, > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones > *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 9:43 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] cost effective, mid-range performance Mikrotik > router needed > > > > given the issues weve been having with mikrotik sfp, and Ethernet. we > decided yesterday a procurve is going between. we will just vlan the ports > in the procurve. > > I like the 1810G and the rb1100ahx2 in a vertical 4U rack for our small > enclosures and a racket 12u in our tall enclosures > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > And yes, a 48 to 24 little device thingy is required, guess you can’t > everything > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard > *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 5:09 PM > *To:* af <[email protected]> > > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] cost effective, mid-range performance Mikrotik > router needed > > > > Yeah... that would be really nice. I think the only Mikrotik routers that > currently support a decent voltage range are some of the CCRs and the hEX > POE... which isn't bad, but only 5 ethernet ports. Oh, there is at least > one CRS that supports 57v, but it's CPU is kind of underpowered for using > as a real router (it's similar to the 2011 if I remember correctly). > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If it only supported 10-60VDC. I hate having to add a DC-DC converter for > one damn device. > > On 7/21/2017 3:40 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > Yup, RB3011 is what you want. > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yep, don’t why I didn’t think of that. The 3011 will fit the bill nicely > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners > *Sent:* Friday, July 21, 2017 1:36 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] cost effective, mid-range performance Mikrotik > router needed > > > > RB3011. Fast, stable (once you upgrade past earlt factory firmware that > had packet loss bug), $170. > > > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > As we moved all out towers to Fiber / Power up the tower, we still have > the router at the bottom (running a UBNT S16) at the tower top. The only > thing we really have at the bottom that plugs into the router (other than > Fiber) is a SiteMonitor. (Boy, I wish it had an SFP, but I digress.) > > > > So, we use something like the CRSCRS125-24G-1S (because it was already > there and has an SFP port) or a RB2011 (same reason). Both have a 600Mhz > MIPS 74Kc V4.12. > > I am looking to find something that has more power without jumping up to a > $ 380 CCR1009. We have 25+ towers that fit into that scenario. In each > case, these towers never push for than 50 Mbit of BW but often go over 60% > CPU. The use Queues per connected customers (that it grabs from Radius) > and very basic Firewall rules to restrict access on all the good ports to > our internal office subnet. > > > > But, we just need a bit more horsepower. Was wondering if someone had any > ideas? Like maybe building some little cube box to run ROS, but not seeing > a cost effective solution that has a fiber port and a copper port. There > is the Power Box pro with same CPU but 800Mhz, but not sure that would be > the tipping point that we need long term. > > > > Any suggestions> > > > > Paul > > > > > > Paul McCall, President > > PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. > > 658 Old Dixie Highway > > Vero Beach, FL 32962 > > 772-564-6800 <%28772%29%20564-6800> > > [email protected] > > www.pdmnet.com > > www.floridabroadband.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
