We had a lot of issues with our first B11 link, but after we eventually got the original made in California flakey radios with newer made in China ones, both our links have been working fine. You can get a full gig through a B11 link, but they seem to me a lot less consistent tan a normal licensed radio, so I'm not sure I'd plan on them doing much over 700mbps anyway. Airfiber 11 really isn't a bad option, they'll probably get you 500-600mbps and they're half the price of anything else.
On Jul 25, 2017 1:30 AM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve got 3 11GHz Mimosa links up, one at 50 miles. Haven’t had a single > issue with any of them. On my 50 mile link under about 80% load capacity, > I get 2-5ms. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett > *Sent:* Monday, July 24, 2017 8:23 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SAF CFIP Lumina link aggregation in 2+0 mode vs > Mimosa b11 > > > > Use the SAF integra and you'll get 948Mbps > > > > -Sean > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:57 PM Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We are looking at raising capacity on one of our major link from 366 to > whatever. SAF 2+0 says in the documentation we can go up to 732mbps > > > > Mimosa, with the same antenna characteristics claims different numbers > everytime I look at the report. their path profile tool is junk. > > > > Its a lot of radio sticking with SAF, and supposedly mimosa can do more, > though I suspect its like the ubnt of licensed links, a little more buggy. > We already commited to two mimosa 11ghz links elsewhere on the network, and > weve been told its all software defined do a single unit to spare for all > of them sounds pretty good. > > > > I haven't actually priced cambium, mainly because when we first got into > 11ghz, nobody would quote us > > > > the link is just a little over 10 miles and has a 3' on one side, 4' on > the other, with whatever the SAF interface mount is called > > > > are these mimosa radios worth their salt? theyre dirt cheap, which is > nice, but I'm not feeling a lot of joy so far with them > >
