I graph/poll the SNMP sync stat.  There's one AP that gives me some hassle
but all of the other ones are just fine.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:

> review your AP logs, you might be suprised
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> GPS pucks are perfectly reliable for us.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> packetflux is the only way to sync, everything else is garbage, GPS
>>> pucks aren't reliable, CTMs and CMMs are a waste of money and are no where
>>> near as versatile, cambium cant get their pucks to work, so I wouldn't
>>> trust their little syncpipe knockoffs either. Ala-cart sync, switch
>>> agnostic, no worries. Small sites you can split one injector to power
>>> and/or sync a mix of voltages and pinouts, PLUS (this is a big thing) two
>>> Fridays ago, after hours, had an issue with getting one working, got direct
>>> communication from packetflux and got things going, good luck with that
>>> from cambium and their new tiered support
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:54 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's not only the antenna. Newer 1000 boards and all 2k's have a
>>>> GPS+GLONASS receiver. They also updated the 450AP a couple years ago with a
>>>> revision that includes this receiver. GPS-only kinda always sucked. With
>>>> GLONASS added, you have a lot more sats available, so the probability of
>>>> maintaining lock is much, much better. I really wish Forrest would start
>>>> using this in his pipes and boxes.
>>>>
>>>> Typically moving the antenna a few inches or a foot says there's some
>>>> multipath going on. And sometimes the receivers just get confused and need
>>>> a power-cycle. I have some SyncPipes on 1-foot stand-offs with another 300'
>>>> of tower above them and rain will make them see no sats.
>>>>
>>>> What has worked better for me than anything else is a SyncInjector and
>>>> pipe/box on the ground away from tower steel and lots of RF. Even then,
>>>> those get confused sometimes too. Usually when I see really bad fading at
>>>> night during the summer, I'll see that tracked sats will go from the normal
>>>> 9-12 down to 5-7, but they rarely lose lock.
>>>>
>>>> Once upon a time, I had a SyncInjector and a pipe running in the server
>>>> room for 4-5 days (because I forgot to run a cable outside for the pipe).
>>>> It worked fine... until it rained.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/26/2017 1:31 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When we first started using EPMP, (5ghz, with GPS) we had some AP's
>>>>> would keep losing satellites.  Then after our first couple installs,
>>>>> everything just Worked after that.  Slap the GPS antenna on any random
>>>>> surface, and lots-o-satellites with no issues.  Now the New AP's we're
>>>>> getting out of Distribution have the GLONASS label on the antennas, and
>>>>> we're back to having hit and miss GPS again at new sites.  Are the new
>>>>> antennas less sensitive?  At one location, 1 out of the 4 APs was going
>>>>> from 12 satellites tracked (20 visible) to 0 Satellites tracked (still 20
>>>>> visible) at random times.  We moved the GPS Puck about 4 inches 
>>>>> vertically,
>>>>> and now it has a steady 17 satellites tracked.
>>>>>
>>>>> Has something changed with the Antennas?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to