Is there such a thing as a “recent” R56?  I did not realize someone was 
updating that document.

From: Paul McCall 
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:28 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Choice on Power Panels at new install

Sure…..

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 4:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Choice on Power Panels at new install

 

I can probably post a recent R56 on a download site if you want it.

 

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:05 PM Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

  Lewis, 

   

  I am going to try your recommendation on some of the towers that I own.  

   

  Paul

   

  From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman

  Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 4:04 PM


  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Choice on Power Panels at new install

   

  I like putting a panel protector in. It doesn't hep in a very near strike but 
it does with the incoming stuff off the grid.

   

  On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 3:02 PM Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

    Yep, we run 10 gauge out the 200ft.  our own breaker, plenty of room in the 
panel.  We beef up the ground in the service panel that feeds us < 5ohm, and 
often install a panel protector there as well as next to the tower panel.

     

    From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
    Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 1:15 PM


    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Choice on Power Panels at new install

     

    Not if there is sufficient line gauge to support the load and there is room 
in the panel.

     

    On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:58 AM Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

      That’s what I was thinking, but I wanted others opinions.

       

      😊

       

      From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
      Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:57 PM
      To: [email protected]
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Choice on Power Panels at new install

       

      Less points of failure at the main, one less breaker, one less spot for 
some random dude to shut something off. 50 foot isn't all that far unless we 
are talking about boring through 50 foot of concrete, bonding your ground to 
the main rather than the sub panel means less chance of you shunting for the 
subpanel

       

      On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

        Electrical opinions wanted.

         

        On a new tower, the main panel is 200ft. away and a harder run to get 
to (but doable).

         

        There is a subpanel in a barn 150ft. away.  Often we go to the easiest 
place, but am taking a step back at all this kind of stuff (you can tell by my 
other threads).  Regardless, we are going to put our own panel at out equipment 
box at the base of the tower, drive our own electrical ground, install panel 
protector , bond to the tower, etc.

         

        Is there a reason we would want to be on the main panel (more direct) 
vs a subpanel (one hop in the middle but closer) ??

         

        Paul

         

        Paul McCall, President

        PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.

        658 Old Dixie Highway

        Vero Beach, FL 32962

        772-564-6800  

        [email protected]

        www.pdmnet.com

        www.floridabroadband.com

         

         

       

Reply via email to