I thought about reaching out to them but their business is just so... Boring.
On Aug 1, 2017 3:20 PM, "Chris Wright" <ch...@velociter.net> wrote: > Perhaps it would cost effective to do three short 500M 60-80GHz hops over > the freeways and railroad tracks with fiber underground through the open > space between them? At that point it might just be better to go through the > paperwork headache of boring all the way through. I know a guy in Los > Angeles who likes digging tunnels. > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:26 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] moving 10gbps 12 miles > > > > Not in one hop with one set of radios, no. There are ways to achieve 6 > Gbps full duplex using multiple parallel 18 GHz (80 MHz) dual polarity > links, if you could coordinate enough high/low frequency pairs on the path. > It would be a number of dishes and radios. > > Or some combination of 11 GHz/80 MHz channel/dual polarity links and > several 18 GHz/80MHz channel/dual polarity links. I would not recommend > trying to aggregate such together at L2 due to slightly different > performance of different radios and polarities on the same path. Aggregated > together at L3 by having multiple OSPF equal cost links between two > routers, one on each end, so that the traffic flows between 1GbE router > interfaces were distributed equally. > > There are 10 Gbps 71-86 GHz band radios now. Distances are good for like, > 2 miles at high reliability, not much more. > > > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Im guessing there is no realistic (cost competitive to fiber) option aside > from fiber to move this kind of bandwidth, or is there? > > > > Fiber would require traversing 2 state highways and a railroad track, so > there is that. > > >
