Requiring multiple carriers definitely isn't a national thing. Whether or
not you should build one big enough is a whole separate question.

I like the tower business. I am finishing a 300 foot next week. Building a
tower a carrier will get on is a big PITA though. You really need an ASR

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, 12:29 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> There was a law firm selling some language like that to municipalities.
> The intent was to have one tower on the skyline instead of 3 or 4.  The
> real effect is you get 3 or 4 bigger towers on the skyline.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Christopher Gray" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: 8/3/2017 12:24:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tower Options: Big Enough to Lease Space?
>
> I think that depends on the local bylaws (I have not seen it on a larger
> scale, but I may be wrong). In my town they have a maximum height limit of
> 80ft but they want you to accommodate 5 carriers :-).
>
> This is in a nearby town that does not have the same requirements.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> It's been awhile since I've looked at this. Isn't there a requirement now
>> to make the tower large enough to accommodate several other tenants?
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2017 8:03 AM, "Christopher Gray" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm preparing to purchase a piece of property that is in a group of
>>> towers. It currently has an old ~100' guyed Rohn 45G. I would be looking to
>>> replace that..
>>>
>>> I'm considering a couple possible options for replacement:
>>>
>>> 1. Replace with improved tower big enough for my needs.
>>> 2. Replace with an oversized tower that could allow for cell carrier
>>> leasing.
>>> 3. Approach a cell carrier to have them build a new tower that I could
>>> use.
>>>
>>> Is it worth building large enough to lease space? Is it worth asking a
>>> cell carrier to lease the space and build a tower there if I can get the
>>> space I need on the tower as part of the agreement?
>>>
>>> Thank you - Chris
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to