Thanks guys.

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote:

> For what it’s worth, a friend of mine’s company does scanning on large
> scale.  They work with medical and legal outfits the most where they take
> thousands and thousands of documents, scan them, and through their software
> system created a fully searchable database application.  Neat business
> really ….
>
> Anyways, they use nothing but high end Fujistu scanners and swear by them
> …. something like $4k a piece the units they are using but their more
> economical units are supposed to be pretty good too especially if you’re
> not doing many thousands daily kind of thing …
>
> Paul
>
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'll second the Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500 Wireless Desktop Scanner. We have
> both it and 2 neats. While I like the simplicity of the neat scanners for a
> couple of reasons the Fujitsu seems to scan anything you can cram in it
> while the neat often refuses to scan a perfect piece of paper for some
> mystery reason.
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 10:52 AM SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:
>
>> I like my
>>
>>
>>
>> Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500 Wireless Desktop Scanner
>>
>>
>>
>> Auto feed, scans both sides, scans to PDF, straightens crooked scans,
>> OCRs so fully searchable PDF.
>>
>>
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 10, 2017 7:50 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Document scanners
>>
>>
>>
>> Any recommendations on these? There is a 5 year old thread I found where
>> Neat and Fujitsu were recommended - nothing newer though.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to