I also use maps a lot larger than my display resolution. I bet your RM didn't incorporate the land cover data until it drew a new map. I would try drawing it again at the size you want.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > I routinely make maps wider than my display...never noticed anything like > that. > > Don't forget to set your heights and densities. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: 8/15/2017 3:54:25 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT RM Question > > Interesting, if you have your map view wider in pixels than your display, > the land cover data will not show. > I made my map smaller because the legend was not fully visible. Once I > hit 1850 pixels wide, then the thing lit up with all kinds of colors. > > *From:* Chuck McCown > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 15, 2017 1:34 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT RM Question > > OK, finally found a place to get landcover data. > http://rmd.neoknet.com/Landcover/ > > All the other links seem to not work. > > I got the files I needed manually extracted into the proper folder. > It would download them but not save them. Perhaps because they were zip > files not the native file. > > In any event, nothing looks different. If I do a path profile it shows > some little trees, which don’t look as tall or as thick as I think they > should be. > The map and pictures etc have not changed. Should the map look > different? > > Did I go through all that just to have stuff on the profile that I don’t > trust? > >
