Ok...that makes sense...thanks Jaime Solorza
On Aug 17, 2017 7:57 AM, "Carl Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Lewis was responding to "If absolutely all the electronics are at > the bottom, having just antennas and waveguide at the tower, I think it > ahould be almost impossible to have a lightning strike damage gear. > " > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Bad connectors and connections don't cause problems? A bad or leaky >> ground on a Heliax cable will not cause problems? If I am wrong, I will >> ask Tessco for refund on trip to training >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Aug 16, 2017 9:13 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You are so wrong. >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017, 12:47 PM Colin Stanners <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If absolutely all the electronics are at the bottom, having just >>> antennas and waveguide at the tower, I think it ahould be almost impossible >>> to have a lightning strike damage gear. >>> >>> On Aug 16, 2017 5:29 AM, "David Milholen" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I am asking for pure simple curiosity. >>> >>> How far would you go and how much would you spend to have a bullet proof >>> Tower site? >>> >>> I am looking for answers in small class tower to super duty types or >>> leases. >>> >>> What I mean by bullet proof is How many time a year are you replacing >>> gear due to weather complications >>> >>> or how many times are you going to back to the site to reboot something >>> . How many times are you remoting into a >>> >>> site to adj power or channels to avoid interference. How many times are >>> you having to make adjustments to ethernet ports. >>> >>> All these tasks add up in time. >>> >>> Our team this year has only had to visit 2 sites unexpectedly due to >>> weather and take the next step in making it bullet proof. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Carl Peterson > > *PORT NETWORKS* > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > > (410) 637-3707 >
