Lol, no, i was at one of those this weekend, all i could figure there is
using their electric conduit for fiber to feed low power access points at
the power hookups, or 900 mhz and you rent tripods with flexible rugged cat5

On Aug 17, 2017 7:44 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

> Ah ok. I thought you were talking about campground-in-the-woods-for-
> netflix.
>
> On Aug 17, 2017 7:24 PM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As best i can tell, vlan aside cnmaestro does that. Everything is
>> template and serial number based so config would be a no brainer, backhaul
>> would be backhaul, thats no special feat.
>> Im looking at a small campground for work, 2 aps at most and we already
>> serve the office and another building from an epmp sm in ap mode so the
>> sites already in cnmaestro
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2017 7:12 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
>>
>> What about backhaul? Captive portal? Vlan assignment? Per user or per
>> service QoS? WiFi air packet diagnostics for troubleshooting? Single or
>> dual or triple radio? AirTime leveling? How hard is it to push the same
>> config to other devices? Compliment of various antennas?
>>
>> You may not need or want any of this. Or, you might.
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2017 7:02 PM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> There is an outdoor wifi accesspoint
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2017 6:46 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can one of those even... I guess wds bridge to another unit while still
>>>> serving clients?
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 17, 2017 6:32 PM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Because its there
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 17, 2017 5:49 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would you want to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2017 5:44 PM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is anybody using the cnpilot stuff with cnmaestro for this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Timothy Steele <
>>>>>> timothy.pct...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do all unifi with unifi mesh for your BH's use all switches unifi
>>>>>>> POE Switches get a cloud key this way you will see graph data of 100% of
>>>>>>> the network see how is having signal issues and what AP's are going down
>>>>>>> captive portal and QOS all built in 100% Unifi with unifi controller is 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> only way I would ever do a campground again when you mix other gear it 
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> just a nightmare to maintain not even worth it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017, 9:46 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Limit your datarates to 12Mb and above will shrink you cell size,
>>>>>>>> but will keep your data rates sane. There's a lot of cool tweaks in 
>>>>>>>> UniFi
>>>>>>>> these days. AirTime Fairness can help a lot as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Meshv3 is on the horizon as an in-place upgrade to the existing
>>>>>>>> hardware. Looks good so far.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 14, 2017 10:57 PM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We max out at 10Mbps.  In testing the Unifi mesh, we consistently
>>>>>>>>> saw 18Mbps with 100 devices on 3 radios.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *CBB - Jay
>>>>>>>>> Fuller
>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 14, 2017 6:40 PM
>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] campground wifi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on average what speed service are you selling campgrounds?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm assuming 100-250 campers during peak times
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *From:* Layne Sisk <la...@serverplus.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 14, 2017 3:50 PM
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] campground wifi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We support several campgrounds and I know it is more expensive,
>>>>>>>>> but you may want to at least consider Rukus gear.  It seems quite 
>>>>>>>>> stable in
>>>>>>>>> the environment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Layne Sisk
>>>>>>>>> ServerPlus
>>>>>>>>> 801.426.8283, ext 102 <(801)%20426-8283>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] On
>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Jay Weekley
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 12:34 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] campground wifi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gotcha.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > Yeah, Rockets and Nanobeams are 802.11n 802.11ac is totally a
>>>>>>>>> thing
>>>>>>>>> > now.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>>> > From: "Jay Weekley" <par...@cyberbroadband.net>
>>>>>>>>> > To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>> > Sent: 8/14/2017 2:30:55 PM
>>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] campground wifi
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >> 11ac?
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >> Adam Moffett wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >>> If you're building new, why not 11ac instead of 11n?
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>>> >>> From: "Jay Weekley" <par...@cyberbroadband.net>
>>>>>>>>> >>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>>>>>>> >>> Sent: 8/14/2017 2:27:50 PM
>>>>>>>>> >>> Subject: [AFMUG] campground wifi
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>> We're looking to upgrade the WiFi at some campgrounds and
>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>> >>>> suggestions.  Right now I'm thinking about a 5 GHz Rocket on
>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> >>>> omni to a Nanobeam at each client access point.  I think we
>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>> >>>> offer connectivity to the campers in both 2.4 and 5 GHz.
>>>>>>>>> What do
>>>>>>>>> >>>> you think?  Unifi?
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>> ---
>>>>>>>>> >>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>>>>>>>> >>> http://www.avg.com
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to