Yea, sometimes money is better spent doing something than thinking about
doing something...testing. Sometimes...not so much. Wish I could positively
identify the prior. Most guesses are correct, but that one you miss can
even things up. I can say you can rent a S412e for a week for a lot less
than that and generate a 3d map with SSI plotted. I like Rory's idea. Tell
them you can install the system for about that and will only charge them an
additional $1500 a year to maintain it and make system modifications as
needed. Of course they have to supply the man lifts for that price.

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:27 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I agree...I am going to offer a very simple and down to earth proposal
> using valid testing procedures...I will set up APs in key areas and run
> tests all over warehouse.  I will move gear to different locations behind
> and in front of racks...I will generate a heat map ...I will shoot for even
> coverage through out and figure out best places for APs ...it appears they
> want to use WiFi hand held scanners throughout facility.  I am confident
> they will not need a ton of APs nor fancy controllers.  But I will know
> more when they reply to my questions.  The other company has a Cisco
> wireless guy.  I have a recently retired WSMR EE ,our guitarist and life
> long friend on my team...he worked with missile telemetry and communication
> systems for 33 years.  Should be fun.
>
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Aug 22, 2017 10:07 PM, "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You can put an entire batch of APs in there that will auto power to
>> reduce interference for that much money.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 22, 2017 4:53 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cisco site survey
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello vatos locos...does any one have a sample of a Cisco WiFi site
>> survey report they can share?  Apparently they want to charge $6000.00 to
>> conduct one for a warehouse that looks like this.  Thanks
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>

Reply via email to