They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems
fine so far. The throughput improvements involve basic bridge config. No
extra QoS, no L2/L3 firewall rules. Basically like MikroTik's fast-path.
Jay, I think Force200's are going to be your best bet. If your uplink
speeds suck, then more gain at the SM and thus higher RSSI at the AP
certainly can't hurt. Get the uplink SNRs up and the speeds should come
with it.
On 8/27/2017 7:03 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
The current beta rc says it has throughput improvements, may look into
that
On Aug 27, 2017 6:00 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I will post this on the epmp forums a bit later but aside from
improving the upload signal or changing the downlink ratio on a
timed EPMP system is there any way to improve the upload? We have
a few customers I know with signals in the mid 70s on 2.4 that are
getting 10-15 meg down but less than a meg up. Sometimes as
little as 200k up.
Looking to improve that.
One (and possibly both) are with an integrated unit with I believe
a 60 degree antenna. I feel sure a force 200 with a tighter
beamwidth will help increase the received signal at the tower.
Any one having this problem?
Anyone having any luck using a ubnt radio over a force 200 to get
a little better signal strength at the tower?
2.4 and 900 are both challenging bands to work in :)
