Forrest, quit working and come out and play with us....

From: Chuck McCown 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:49 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device

But you can use a voltage divider to convert the 0-5 volt to 0-.1 volt.  
Two resistors.  

From: George Skorup 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:48 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device

No, the SiteMonitor shunt input is ±100mV nominal.


On 8/30/2017 12:42 PM, Jesse DuPont wrote:

  Would these work on a SiteMonitor? They output 1-5V DC based on current 
flowing through.

  https://flexscada.com/product/hall-effect-current-sensor-ac-75a-dc-100a/


  Jesse DuPont

  Network Architect
  email: [email protected]
  Celerity Networks LLC

  Celerity Broadband LLC
  Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc

  Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband


  On 8/30/17 11:29 AM, George Skorup wrote:

    Yeah, about that. I wouldn't use those on 12VDC systems. Too much current. 
I've burned up a couple of the 10A shunts on Traco BCMUs that were running 
around 200W load on battery. 200/13 = 15 amps. Ungood. One site at about 225W, 
first time it went to battery, the shunt went kaput after 10-15 minutes and the 
site went down.

    I'm hoping Forrest comes up with some Hall effect stuff or even plain 20+ 
amp shunts that can be used on the SiteMonitor's existing 100mv input. Hall 
effect is nice because you don't have to be "in" the circuit. But I'll take 
what I can get.


    On 8/30/2017 10:26 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:

      Yeah, up to 10 amp.


      ------ Original Message ------
      From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]>
      To: [email protected]
      Sent: 8/30/2017 11:18:36 AM
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device

        I think Forrest has them on his site with the site monitors.  

        From: Sam Lambie 
        Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:15 AM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring 
device

        Parallel. Site Monitor! Now where can I get a shunt?

        On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

          4 batts in series or parallel?  
          Shunt + sitemonitor would be a better way to go and you don’t have to 
write code.  

          From: Sam Lambie 
          Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:06 AM
          To: [email protected] 
          Subject: [AFMUG] Cost effective battery charging and monitoring device

          Hey all, 
          I am getting away from using APC at a couple of our sites and right 
now I have installed a Tripp-Lite APS750 connected to 4 Deep cycle marine 
batteries for a total of 404 aH system. I'd like to be able to monitor the 
discharge rate of the batteries when power is out remotely. What have you guys 
been doing to that effect?

          I'm thinking a Pi and a shunt and some quick scripting classes on 
Python to put it all together...


          -- 

          -- 
          Sam Lambie
          Taosnet Wireless Tech.
          575-758-7598 Office
          www.Taosnet.com




        -- 

        -- 
        Sam Lambie
        Taosnet Wireless Tech.
        575-758-7598 Office
        www.Taosnet.com





Reply via email to