Shut up george, dont make logical sense

On Sep 28, 2017 12:25 AM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I thought half or most of the issue was the "edge providers"?
>
> Consumer wants edge providers' content.
> Edge provider makes money from the consumer. Advertising. The content
> itself. Etc.
> Edge provider doesn't want to pay carrier for transit.
> Both sides bitch. Peering is overloaded.
> Gov't steps in to "fix" it.
>
> Data caps and speed tiers weren't dissolved with NN. So what does it do
> for the consumer? Or for that matter, the carrier? Who does it "protect"
> other than the edge provider? Seems it's only protecting their profits.
>
> On 9/27/2017 11:40 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> That's pretty much how I've always seen it... NN always seemed to me more
> of a solution to a problem that people were afraid might be there someday,
> which the market would more than likely take care of by itself if it
> actually does happen, than a solution to an actual real problem.
>
> On Sep 27, 2017 11:26 PM, "Jason McKemie" <j.mckemie@veloxinetbroadband.
> com> wrote:
>
>> I'd think the big guys getting greedy (and being allowed to do as they
>> wish with their networks) would only help the smaller providers. It's
>> certainly possible that I'm missing something though.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 27, 2017, George Skorup <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think Steve is saying, what was broken 4 years ago that needed NN to
>>> come fix it?
>>>
>>> On 9/27/2017 10:08 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>> How so?
>>>>
>>>> It depends on which session. Sometimes we at least had lube, or there
>>>> was the threat of getting fucked, but we just hadn't been moved into
>>>> the same cell block of our admirer yet. Sometimes we just got "raw
>>>> dogged".
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Steve Jones <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Were we fucked 4 years ago?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 27, 2017 9:30 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's some points that are obviously wrong, and some that are not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, as consumers, if net neutrality is repealed we are fucked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2017 8:27 PM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.theverge.com/2017/9/27/16374136/ajit-pai-fcc-net
>>>>>>> -neutrality-isp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I pretty much had to quit reading when this idiot sated what the
>>>>>>> FCCs job
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to