so put it in the documentation, then... :-)
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Chuck Macenski <ch...@macenski.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just to be official about is, all airFIber radios support transport of > Jumbo packets sizes of 9000+ bytes. The currently supported packet size is > 9600. There is no configuration required - they just do it. > > I am an Ubiquiti employee :) > > Chuck > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not here for your approval friend! >> Pal! >> Buddy! >> >> /smacks Mike on slack >> >> On Sep 28, 2017 1:10 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >>> That's a much better statement. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:54:43 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ben Moore, ubnt, fix your documentation of basic >>> things! >>> >>> I think you're thinking about this too hard, or maybe I wasn't explicit >>> enough. Typing from a phone causes that. >>> >>> Yes, I'm staying if you are building the type of network where you have >>> identified a large MTU is desirable on the L2 path, you want everything to >>> be as high as possible, and you will be limited by the devices smallest MTU >>> on the path. >>> >>> On Sep 28, 2017 12:51 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> no, it doesn't, only if you are building L2 networks bridged between >>>> multiple locations. It's perfectly fine to have a router-to-router OSPF /30 >>>> link that is carried across a PTP system with a 1600 byte MTU (older >>>> Bridgewave radios for instance), then another separate set of OSPF >>>> interfaces onwards from that same router, to another router, over a 9000 >>>> byte MTU radio bridge. Or whatever. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> MTU needs to be consistent on the entirety of the path. >>>>> >>>>> AirFiber supports 9600 MTU since 1.1 FW. >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 28, 2017 12:35 PM, "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I agree, was just looking for that a week ago too. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I’m still unclear. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> My backbone is generally set for 9000+ MTU. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Do I need to change my Mikrotik Ethernet ports attached to the Air >>>>>> Fiber units to a specific MTU? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke >>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 28, 2017 11:34 AM >>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ben Moore, ubnt, fix your documentation of >>>>>> basic things! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> oh yeah, and there is no mention of MTU capabilities for any model of >>>>>> airfiber in the most recent pdf datasheet either: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/airfiber/airFiber_DS.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that not a basic datasheet thing to list? Particularly for PTP >>>>>> bridge radios? I know it is for every serious PTP radio I've seen from >>>>>> almost every other manufacturer. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, I know this, and everyone on the list knows this, because we've >>>>>> been using the AF24 for years. We know we can use it with either 1600 or >>>>>> 9000 byte MTU. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But I find it amazing that there is no mention anywhere of max MTU >>>>>> (or MTU settings/capabilities in general) anywhere whatsoever in the ubnt >>>>>> AF24 users manual: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dl.ubnt.com/guides/airfiber/airFiber_AF24_UG.pdf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ctrl-f for "mtu"... nothing. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> People should not be required to google "af24 mtu 9000" and trawl >>>>>> through forum posts from non-ubnt-employee third parties on the ubnt >>>>>> forum >>>>>> to know if a PTP bridge product is going to work for a particular >>>>>> application or not. Same goes for the AF11FX and AF24HD. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >
