My cost is closer to $2 a foot for RFS while my cost for 1200 is a bit more
than $5.

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 12:37 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We have all the tools for Heliax connector prep and it is still my
> preferred RF cable.    But at 5.00 plus a foot, the water company
> purchasing guy is asking for alternatives.  Not sure it will fly with their
> new RF SCADA tech who came from a Motorola 2 way dealer.
>
>
>
> Jaime Solorza
> Wireless Systems Architect
> 915-861-1390 <(915)%20861-1390>
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I prefer it to Heliax, but you do have to take some time to comb out the
>> braid where it goes over the collar that pinches it into the connector.
>> And it will not kink like Heliax.
>>
>> *From:* Lewis Bergman
>> *Sent:* Monday, October 09, 2017 10:55 AM
>> *To:* Animal Farm
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Heliax substitute
>>
>> LMR-1200 does compare but I will warn you. LMR-1200 has very similar
>> specs and is actually much tougher than Heliax. The issue is installing the
>> connectors. Unlike the smaller braided cables, 1200 takes patience and time
>> to make sure that you get the strands correct. If you don't get everything
>> just right the connector will shift back and forth on the coax. You will
>> still have a shield ground typically but it just isn't good to have
>> movement like that.
>>
>> They may have easier connectors to use now as I haven't used them in a
>> long time.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 11:35 AM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 928.xxx/952.xxxMHz
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>> Wireless Systems Architect
>>> 915-861-1390 <(915)%20861-1390>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> lmr-1200 depending on frequency
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, October 09, 2017 10:20 AM
>>>> *To:* Animal Farm
>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Heliax substitute
>>>>
>>>> What compares to 7/8 Andrew Heliax cable for 300 ft. runs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to