No... definitely not.

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I assume these aren't AGM.
>
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017, 4:01 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Have you looked at marine deep cycle batteries? I'm not sure what the 100
>> hour discharge rate is (I don't think the ones I was looking at listed it),
>> but if I remember correctly, they were around $80 for somewhere around 100
>> ah @ 20 hour discharge rate last time I was looking up prices.
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:57 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Lead, acid.
>>> Not in a moving vehicle, in an temperature controlled space.
>>> Not cycled.
>>> Float operation.
>>>
>>> I think that even if they were cheap crap, they might do OK.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Robert
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2017 2:31 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Batt Prices
>>>
>>> So is there something about these batteries that gives you a good
>>> feeling as to actual quality beyond the marketing blurb with the
>>> product?   I only have the pure weight to be an independent judge right
>>> now.
>>>
>>> On 10/14/17 1:14 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sho-nuff
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/14/2017 1:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeahbut, I had to do some manual screen scraping and data entry.� So
>>>>> I was a bit lazy.� And since I really don�t care about physical specs
>>>>> (being a cheap ass) that is all I did.� So, yeah, I can.� Do you want
>>>>> the spread sheet?� Winking smile
>>>>> �
>>>>> *From:* Bill Prince
>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 14, 2017 2:12 PM
>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Batt Prices
>>>>> �
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you add column(s) for group size and weight?
>>>>>
>>>>> �
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/14/2017 12:55 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My list so far.� Price per watt hour is based on the 100 hour
>>>>>> discharge rate.�
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to