Depending on the split you need, I could get you some very aggressively priced 11G SAF Lumina that are used, working when taken down, With dishes or without. All you would have to do is buy the 1+1 mount or LACP them. That would double your capacity and hopefully at least get you through a deployed FTTH where replacement is pushed down the road. When you have to replace it the money is there to do it.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:23 AM Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > SAF again. Very stable HW. > > > > We have done a NEC 18GHz Link recently as SAF had not enough TX-Power to > get 2048QAM at 10km using 2ft dishes. Runs very reliable and is well built, > too. I dont like 3ft dishes as they get a lot windload and > handling/alignment is more difficult. > > > > AF-11x got some SW Updates recently but still seems a bit of „cheap built“ > for a licensed link. But if there are backup links it might be > considerable. Cheap enough to keep spare parts. > > > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Paul McCall > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 27. Oktober 2017 13:52 > *An:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* [AFMUG] Considerations for upgrading passed SAF Lumina link > > > > We have a 4 year old Lumina link from our core, 12.9 miles, 11Ghz with 3ft > dishes on each end, that doesn’t have enough BW for us long term, as we > are going to do another hop from there (7.3 miles), then FTTH. > > > > I get around 270Mbit from it, and we already use 120Mit pretty > consistently and if another tower OSPFs to it, more than that. Sooo, I am > looking for alternatives. Its mainly one-way traffic of course, so a > solution that favored that would be acceptable. > > > > Cost is a factor of course, as I also have a “parallel path” a few miles > south to do the same on very soon. Something that could use the same > dishes from the SAF would be good also. > > > > I have some undeployed Mimosa B11’s that we bought for a project and are > still waiting on some tower rights to get settled. I could use those, or > maybe AF-11X or multiples thereof. I might as well plan for the future > since this is a “main artery” link. We have sufficient 11 Ghz channels > available to license. > > > > Thoughts and suggestions are appreciated ! > > > > Paul > > > > Paul McCall, President > > PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. > > 658 Old Dixie Highway > <https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962+772&entry=gmail&source=g> > > Vero Beach, FL 32962 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962+772&entry=gmail&source=g> > > 772-564-6800 <(772)%20564-6800> > > [email protected] > > www.pdmnet.com > > www.floridabroadband.com > > > > >
