thats cause youre coordinating both channels on both sides
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you have the spectrum. We have tried several links using a "full boat"
> B11 configuration, and have been unable to coordinate a single one. Even in
> places where no other 11 GHz links are nearby.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 10/27/2017 1:16 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's the thing... there are several options that can do ~650Mbps
> for about the same cost as a B11 (or significantly less, with the AF11FX),
> but to get more than that gets expensive pretty quickly. That's where I see
> the B11 as a good fit... it works in those places where you need lots of
> bandwidth, but can't justify spending $10k+ on a link.
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We had a Mimosa B11 link that was just a total PITA. Poor throughput,
>> half duplex, losing the link, etc. We replaced it with an AF11X and it's
>> running 650/650 full duplex, no drops. So maybe the B11 is a good product,
>> but we won't buy any more.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/2017 8:51 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>
>> Matthew, what are you talking about, “not as stable”. I’ve got several
>> links up, one at 50 miles, that runs multiple hotels and food venues, most
>> of which have VoIP and I’ve had zero issues for over a year.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 27, 2017 7:31 AM
>> *To:* af
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Considerations for upgrading passed SAF Lumina
>> link
>>
>>
>>
>> B11's are going to get you the most capacity for the least amount of
>> money, but don't expect them to be as stable as the SAF link. I've been
>> pretty happy with our AF-11FX link, but you're only going to get around
>> double the capacity you have now, and I don't know if there's currently a
>> way to do multiples on one dish... it might make more sense to do like
>> Lewis suggested and add a second Lumina.
>>
>> There are lots of options for higher capacity licensed links, but they
>> start to get pricey.
>>
>> You could probably get Chuck to make you some adapters to hook up just
>> about anything to the SAF dishes.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> We have a 4 year old Lumina link from our core, 12.9 miles, 11Ghz with
>> 3ft dishes on each end, that doesn’t have enough BW for us long term, as
>> we are going to do another hop from there (7.3 miles), then FTTH.
>>
>>
>>
>> I get around 270Mbit from it, and we already use 120Mit pretty
>> consistently and if another tower OSPFs to it, more than that. Sooo, I am
>> looking for alternatives. Its mainly one-way traffic of course, so a
>> solution that favored that would be acceptable.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cost is a factor of course, as I also have a “parallel path” a few miles
>> south to do the same on very soon. Something that could use the same
>> dishes from the SAF would be good also.
>>
>>
>>
>> I have some undeployed Mimosa B11’s that we bought for a project and are
>> still waiting on some tower rights to get settled. I could use those, or
>> maybe AF-11X or multiples thereof. I might as well plan for the future
>> since this is a “main artery” link. We have sufficient 11 Ghz channels
>> available to license.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thoughts and suggestions are appreciated !
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> Paul McCall, President
>>
>> PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.
>>
>> 658 Old Dixie Highway
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway%0D+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962%0D+772&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> Vero Beach, FL 32962
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=658+Old+Dixie+Highway%0D+Vero+Beach,+FL+32962%0D+772&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> 772-564-6800 <%28772%29%20564-6800>
>>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> www.pdmnet.com
>>
>> www.floridabroadband.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
