well that that enom hosts glue records, but theyre not directly visible through rackspace, theyre manageable through a ticket though
not badmouthing rackspace here, this is something i should have done due diligence and did not, but its not a good spot for primary domain registration On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > so we migrated our company DNS registration over to rackspace (enom). > This was part of a long term to get all our domains and our customer > domains under one registrar > > the problem is we host the authoritative records > > at network solutions we st the fqdn nameserver names, but there is a > second location to define those IP address > > Rackspace/enom interface does not have this option > > the anology here is > How do I get to chicago? > Use a map > Wheres the map > In chicago > > Things appear to still be working. The transfer tool place at 2350 last > night. public whois queries are still showing network solutions, Im > assuming this is a propagation time thing. > > The rackspace engineer shows everything functioning, but cannot locate the > IPs listed anywhere. we are assuming the migration pulled a config transfer > at the text level, and its functioning, just with no GUI visibility, Im > also assuming rackspace does not have visibility down to config files, just > whatever their Enom interface is. > > This is all fine and good, I keep my job for a period. but the next step > in this project was changing our authoritative DNS servers to separate > subnets, wont be able to do this. > > > Im going to also assume this boils down to incompetence on my part, there > must be "tiers" of registrars, and I moved our domain to the wrong kind and > am screwed for 60 days. > > Our customer domains all use our nameservers, so if something goes wrong > here, i have alot of pissed off banks. I can recover them by just using > rackspace nameservers for our domain and putting the A records for our > nameservers, but it will kill out domain (rackspace also only allows a > total of like 12 records) > > If I could put A records there for ns1.domain and ns2.domain as well as ns > records it would be fine, but they dont have that record type, or SOA. > > Im at a loss > > Also, if a bunch of banks DNS croaks out this weekend I might be looking > for a job. Im really good at swearing, sweeping, and occasionally > programming some radios if anybody is looking. > > seriously though, what do I do here > > >
