There were a lot of "coulds" on both sides of the argument.
[email protected] wrote:
Not me.
*From:* Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 19, 2017 8:26 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] you all seen this on dsl reports
Ok, but who found the rules onerous?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 12/19/2017 10:20:05 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] you all seen this on dsl reports
they dont know jack how we all operate are own networks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: "Steve Jones" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 12/19/17 10:13
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] you all seen this on dsl reports
"Wireless service providers come up way short in bandwidth
capacity compared to their fiber/cable competitors. So it's no
surprise they favor an environment where they can discriminate on
traffic and demand tolls, in the form of paid prioritization,
lest ye traffic be throttled"
This though.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Tim Reichhart
<[email protected]> wrote:
https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/WISPA-Cheers-the-Death-of-Net-Neutrality-140905
<https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/WISPA-Cheers-the-Death-of-Net-Neutrality-140905>
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
Virus-free. www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
