Oh, cool. I've never used the indoor heat mapping stuff, just thought it would be a good feature.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Quite a few already do that. > > On Jan 23, 2018 8:52 AM, "Cameron Crum" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It would be cool if they could mesh all the top signals together in the >> heat map, then when you move your mouse over a pixel it would show you the >> every AP and its signal strength in a list, or at least the top 3 or 4. So >> your heat map would really a best server map. I wrote a propagation program >> in the late 90's, early 2000's to do this for cellular signals. We could >> even show average throughput on CDMA running it through a simulation >> algorithm. >> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Here is a sample of a warehouse map using a Netgear AP in my backyard to >>> learn how to set up the heat map... >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2018 8:45 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> copacetic :) >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Jaime Solorza >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Good tips...I will post some of the findings.. thanks >>>> > >>>> > Jaime Solorza >>>> > >>>> > On Jan 22, 2018 8:39 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> The small mesh APs would work as well, though you don't have to use >>>> >> the mesh function. I just installed quite a few of these myself. >>>> >> >>>> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> > Lots of UBNT-AC-Lite or similar never set any higher than medium >>>> >> > power. Set min RSSI to force them off at around -75. Heatmap the >>>> >> > warehouse when done to check for coverage gaps. >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Jaime Solorza >>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >> My concern was not on APs...they are going to be UniFi APs from >>>> what >>>> >> >> was >>>> >> >> conveyed to us. I was more concerned on actual scanner issues. >>>> Read >>>> >> >> allot >>>> >> >> of drop off issues with several of the better quality ones so >>>> since we >>>> >> >> don't >>>> >> >> know which ones they are deploying I was fishing for stories. One >>>> of my >>>> >> >> friends just told me to go a bit heavier of number of APs based on >>>> >> >> experience with Home Depot and Walmart issues. More APs needed >>>> than >>>> >> >> planned.... >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Jaime Solorza >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Jan 22, 2018 1:22 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> depending on the size of the warehouse, and cost for utp cat5e >>>> cabling >>>> >> >>> around a lot of areas, think about whether you'd rather go for a >>>> >> >>> larger >>>> >> >>> number of cheaper APs distributed around the place (ex: a lot of >>>> the >>>> >> >>> $79 >>>> >> >>> ubnt uap-ac-lite 802.11ac 2x2 mimo dual band APs, that are 24VDC >>>> >> >>> proprietary >>>> >> >>> power), or a smaller number of $199 type APs (3x3 MIMO, 802.3af >>>> PoE). >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Jaime Solorza >>>> >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Wow, I feel like The Nobody Likes Me dude...no replies, Buehler? >>>> >> >>>> Buehler? >>>> >> >>>> Anyone? >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> On Jan 22, 2018 12:13 PM, "Jaime Solorza" < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> >> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Hello Kool Kats, yeah, copacetic!!! >>>> >> >>>> Anyone have experience setting up WiFi Barcode scanners? >>>> Curious on >>>> >> >>>> typical receiver threshold levels. Client is going to deploy >>>> 10 to >>>> >> >>>> 15 in >>>> >> >>>> large warehouse and I am shooting to design an average -65dBm >>>> >> >>>> coverage level >>>> >> >>>> zone throughput...any ideas,tips or gotchas much >>>> appreciated...can >>>> >> >>>> you dig >>>> >> >>>> it; yeah, knew that you could...thanks >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>> >>
