You also have the issue of the waveform of the inverter.  The kill a watt may 
not read accurately if you are not making a good sine wave.  Also in the input 
it may be pulsed.  So the #10 wire shunt resistor only works if the DC is 
continuous.  

I realize these are minor and perhaps insignificant issues, but if I was doing 
a lab certification test I would worry about these things.  

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:09 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Watts and VA on DC vs AC

That's the way I was leaning.  The part that gave me pause is that the heat gun 
on a wall outlet (not on the inverter) gives me 560W instead of 355W.  About 
the same VA either way.  I would question the measurement except the fan is 
audibly weaker when the heat gun is on the inverter.  Why is less work 
performed when the same device is on the inverter?  Does the low power factor 
indicate an inefficiency that needs to be accounted for on the DC side?



------ Original Message ------
From: "Zach Underwood" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 1/25/2018 11:00:23 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Watts and VA on DC vs AC

  335W/12v= 29.58 amps at 12volts 

  1AC watt = 1DC watt

  On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

    I wanted to rig up a load test for some batteries. 
    I don't have a substantial 12V DC load, so I set up a 1000W inverter, a 
short extension cord, a Kill-a-Watt meter, and a heat gun.

    With the heat gun on low, The kill-a-watt reads 110v, 606 VA, and 355W. 

    The question is how much load is this putting on the battery?  Somewhere 
between 30 and 60amp I guess, and either way my multimeter can't measure more 
than 10A DC current, so I can't measure it directly.  

    My Googling on the topic has failed to enlighten me.  My instinct is to 
think that Watts is Watts, so I should probably use 355W in my calculation of 
battery capacity, but I'm not sure.






  -- 

  Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA) 
  My website

  advance-networking.com

Reply via email to