Good stuff... thanks Jaime Solorza
On Jan 25, 2018 7:36 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]> wrote: > UAP-LR are the higher power, cirular puck's .(they are not the in-wall > units) . best install position is on the roof, facing own.. circular > coverage. (they can be installed on the wall.. but that would not be an > optimum mounting position). > > again, this would not be my choice... UAP-LR are excellent for wide open > spaces.. which a warehouse would be when empty.. but not when it is full.. > I would actually go with the .. ( you can solve the problem with the UAP-LR > and turn down the power .. ) > > My choice would be with the UAP-AC Lite, the smaller ones, with power > turned down, the actual count of deployed units might be a bit higher... > > Regards. > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > http://www.snappytelecom.net > > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518> > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: > [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > *To: *"Animal Farm" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:19:18 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] First Heat Map captures > > They are recommending UAP-LR in documentation but the icon is that in-wall > version in their drawing...I will verify with my contact tomorrow. The UAP > versions have worked out great for me in schools and offices. Thanks for > heads up. . > > Jaime Solorza > > On Jan 25, 2018 7:11 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> That's not not what they looked like in picture i saw on proposal...let >> me double check... thanks!!!! >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Jan 25, 2018 7:07 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Because In-WALLs go in outlet boxes. They're made for hotel rooms, >>> covering teeny tiny spaces. Because of this, they have very poor antenna >>> characteristics. Good for a small/short room, not good for a warehouse. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Why not? I am just downloading PDF on AP now. I have deployed ceiling >>>> ones with great success...the ceilings here at 45 ft. high and bar code >>>> scanners will be at person arm levels 95% of time...they are reading labels >>>> on racks (see picture)...they have sheet rock walls on two offices on one >>>> side at both ends of warehouse, divider walls with sheetrock and wall >>>> behind shipping and receiving department ...all with existing cabling >>>> access and perfect for mounting APs at 10 ft. levels. My APs on tripod >>>> were at level of top of offices and I had great signals both ways in almost >>>> entire warehouse. Even with several rows and aisles full of boxes stack 20 >>>> ft high, signals had no trouble getting through. >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> On Jan 25, 2018 6:46 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Wall APs? I hope they're not trying to do this with the UniFi >>>> IN-WALL.... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > I understand your point...I am told they will use UniFi Wall APs....I >>>> am >>>> > going to buy one and learn it inside out...my bid includes fine >>>> tuning what >>>> > the installation team deploys. >>>> > >>>> > Jaime Solorza >>>> > >>>> > On Jan 25, 2018 6:08 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> "used three APs >>>> >> Ruckus, Ubiquiti in 2.4 and 5Ghz set to 20dBm..." >>>> >> >>>> >> I'm not worried about what the mobile device sees, I'm worried about >>>> >> what the AP sees from the mobile device. >>>> >> >>>> >> If it's set to 20dBm, you need to think about considering adjusting >>>> >> for antenna antenna gain and how that's going to effect >>>> communication. >>>> >> On top of that, the higher you go with power the harder it is to >>>> >> control your cell size - especially in a highly reflective >>>> environment >>>> >> like a warehouse. >>>> >> >>>> >> You may be fine in that environment with a 20 given the number of >>>> >> users and how good the wifi on the hand scanners is.. then again, you >>>> >> might not. >>>> >> >>>> >> Good luck! >>>> >> >>>> >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Jaime Solorza >>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> > Don't think so >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Jaime Solorza >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Jan 24, 2018 12:37 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Power waaayyyyy too high. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> On Jan 24, 2018 1:31 PM, "Jaime Solorza" < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> >> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Spent three hours...that's my son under tripod...used three APs >>>> >> >>> Ruckus, Ubiquiti in 2.4 and 5Ghz set to 20dBm... >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
