Um how often are you loosing contact with your sites to necessitate this LTE backdoor?
Seems like a lot of overkill to make routing changes??? Am I missing something? -sean On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:48 AM TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone want to trade a PPTP connection (prefer you are multihomed) > for the purpose of getting through LTE NAT? AKA I assign you a PPTP account > with a static IPV4 and you do the same, so that if either of our networks > go down we can use the others to tunnel back thru LTE to preform OOBM > functions? We can shape @ 1mbps? > > This is a simple was around paying high fees for a static IP from the > wireless carriers that even offer it... > > I don't really want to subscribe to some russian vpn service if I don't > have to, or pay some cloud based OOBM company which will both cost way > big$$$ > > TJ > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> You can use PPTP through NAT on LTE. You can assign a static private IP >> to both ends of that tunnel. >> If PPTP won't pass something you need, you can run an EoIP tunnel using >> the PPTP IP's as the endpoints of the EoIP tunnel. You end up with a >> tunnel inside of a tunnel. It'll have a lowish real MTU, but you can pass >> 1500 bytes within the EoIP tunnel and it'll just be fragmented. >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: 1/31/2018 12:51:40 PM >> Subject: [AFMUG] OOBE mikrotik >> >> I was wanting to add out of band management via LTE to some of our core >> routers, but I think most/all cellular networks are NAT now so you cannot >> access your LTE devices inbound unless you have it tunnel out to a public >> ip over VPN somewhere right? >> >> How is everyone handling OOBE? >> >> I'm half tempted to do it via VHF low throughput radios! >> >> TJ >> >> >
