That's probably because we, as a culture, do have a really weird puritanical view of the world :)
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > If you look at the rest of the world, many seem to believe the US has > this really weird Puritanical view of the world where gory violence is > 100% okay, but you must be at least 18 years old to see a naked human > being. > > And they're not wrong. > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > who is filtering the analog mediums in this world? they no longer call it > > "sex ed" because its now health ed and no longer is black and white > science, > > more soft core porn. Driving down any road where theres any one if fifty > > billion "protests" going on, pussy hats, signs filled with vulgarity, > women > > wearing boxes with handholes to finger them through for sexual assault, > > apparently its now a teachers sport to have orgies with students. women > in > > restauraints flopping the feedbags out and making sure everyone looks > before > > feeding their babies instead of just dropping a shoulder blanket, parades > > full of cross dressing porn acts, and my personal favorite, our airforce > > drawing huge penises in the sky (heh).. the world is gone to hell > > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:26 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> > >> Well, not really trying to force religious ideas on the population, just > >> religious ideals. > >> > >> The legislation is attempting to force ISPs to offer an in-house > filtering > >> product. > >> > >> Hopefully the bigger ISPs will fight it off. We have an exemption for > the > >> smaller ISPs. > >> > >> From: Josh Reynolds > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 1:19 PM > >> To: af@afmug.com > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering) > >> > >> Escape religious persecution in England to com to America. Establish new > >> Mormon religion. Escape religious persecution in all kinds of places to > >> finally settle in Missouri and Utah. Attempt to force religious ideas on > >> population. > >> > >> Fucking. Morons. > >> > >> On Feb 7, 2018 10:23 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Proposed legislation in Utah. > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds > >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:04 PM > >>> To: af@afmug.com > >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering) > >>> > >>> Where did this post come from? I need some backstory here. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:07 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Based on all your comments (thank you), I sent the following to the > >>>> legislative working group: > >>>> (You guys helped me look smarter than I am ). > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Some random thoughts. > >>>> > >>>> If you are going to an HTTPS site, it is all encrypted. If you are > >>>> attempting to analyze a flow of traffic HTTPS traffic looks the same > to > >>>> us > >>>> whether it is porn or online banking. > >>>> > >>>> Do we also block Bit Torrent? > >>>> XBox Grand Theft Auto > >>>> Any game with online chat. Scrub online chat during games? > >>>> All game servers > >>>> Twitter > >>>> Instagram > >>>> Youtube > >>>> News outlets > >>>> Facebook > >>>> Email > >>>> Instant messaging > >>>> Periscope > >>>> Streaming > >>>> FTP > >>>> IRC > >>>> > >>>> The lowly ping facility has a space for payload. I could send porn > via > >>>> pings if I wanted. > >>>> > >>>> What is defined as harmful content? Medical, artistic, Bible > readings? > >>>> Genesis 19, 29 etc etc. > >>>> Language, if so what language? Bare shoulders. Knees? > >>>> Curtains blowing in the breeze. > >>>> > >>>> How about what I consider pornographic music lyrics. > >>>> Do we have to police music. Police Pandora. > >>>> > >>>> There are always ways around. > >>>> For every block there is a proxy or VPN that will get you around it. > >>>> > >>>> Filters can give parents a false sense of security. Filters are > >>>> gimmicks. > >>>> Snake oil. > >>>> But we do offer them. Not home grown. They are 3rd party. > >>>> > >>> > > >
