The 300s will work with both legacy 1000/2000 and with the new 3000.

Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com

> On Feb 9, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, they'll support 256QAM, so if the signals are good enough, you'll get 
> some more out of them because of that. Beyond that, I don't know that there 
> will be much in the way of gains on a 20mhz channel. As far as I know, 
> they're backwards compatible with 1000 and 2000 APs, but it's possible 
> something has changed there. At any rate, all of the old SMs should be work 
> with the 3000 APs. 
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> will 20mhz channels give you any more jesus juice than 20mhz channels with 
>> the 200APs?
>> as i understand it its only a single revision backward compatible though, 
>> 1000 series will not work with it but 2000 will?
>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <jeffl...@att.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 300s should ship from Asia, along with the PTP550s with a week.  Figure 
>>> 30-45 days from then.
>>> 
>>> Jeff Broadwick
>>> CTIconnect
>>> 312-205-2519 Office
>>> 574-220-7826 Cell
>>> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> They've been taking orders for the SM (Force 300) for awhile, but I still 
>>>> haven't gotten the ones I have on order... I expect they'll be shipping 
>>>> any day now. The epmp 3000 APs probably still won't be out for a few more 
>>>> months, from what I've heard. 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 9, 2018 11:12 AM, "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I believe SM, but not AP
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>> From: "Jon Langeler" <jon-ispli...@michwave.net>
>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2018 12:10:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP AC version?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is that out yet?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jon Langeler
>>>>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to