We had a lot of 4 mile+ links on AF24's that worked perfectly in ALASKA on
the coast.

Some places have more rain/hr than others.

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net>
wrote:

> AF24 is only going to be 5 9's reliable to about 1-2 miles depending on
> your rain zone.
> for 2-4 miles you could use 23Ghz (way more EIRP than 24Ghz)
> 4-8 miles 18Ghz
> 8-20 miles 11 Ghz
> and anything longer than that 6Ghz. unless you can mount really big dishes
> for 11.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
> wrote:
>
>> For 6-10 miles 24 ghz its way out of the question.  Stick to 11 ghz.
>>
>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of David Coudron <
>> david.coud...@advantenon.com>
>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Date: Saturday, February 10, 2018 at 6:57 PM
>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: [AFMUG] 24 GHz vs 11 GHz
>>
>> I know this topic has come up before, but thought I would throw it out
>> again to hear additional thoughts as products continue to evolve.   We have
>> been doing primarily 5 GHz backhaul using Mimosa products for the last
>> couple of years.   Their frequency reuse has really helped us, but we are
>> starting to see more locations that have lots of noise.   We’d like to make
>> the jump to higher frequencies and are looking at 11 GHz and 24 GHz for
>> that.   The links we need are fairly short, 6-10 miles max, which pushes
>> the limits of the 24 GHz solutions, but with a very clean line of site we
>> think we are in range for the links we are looking at as far as the design
>> tools tell us.   For 11 GHz, we would likely stay with the Mimosa product
>> line, we know it pretty well and have all the management tools in place for
>> it.   For 24 GHz we’d likely go with the Ubiquiti AF 24 or AF 24 HD.   We
>> have worked with Ubiquiti stuff here and there, and just don’t have much
>> familiarity with any other options outside of AirFiber.  Here is where we
>> see the Pros and Cons of the two options:
>>
>>
>>
>> Mimosa 11 GHz Pros:
>>
>>    1. Licensed, should be clean spectrum for the full term of the
>>    license and require less babysitting for interference
>>    2. Should support longer links, but that isn’t a big consideration
>>    for us as it looks like everything we will need is under the limits of the
>>    HD for sure and likely the AF 24 as well
>>    3. Little less susceptible to rain fade
>>
>>
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>>    1. Have to mess around with the license and there is a cost
>>    associated with it
>>    2. Have to buy the dish separately, and know which to use before
>>    applying for the license
>>    3. Not quite as much throughput (when compared to the AF 24 HD)
>>    4. More expensive that the AF 24 (but likely a little less than the
>>    HD)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ubiquiti AF 24 Pros:
>>
>>    1. All in one unit, easy to figure out what to have on hand for all
>>    links
>>    2. No messing around with licenses, making it much quicker to deploy
>>    3. Higher throughput on the HD
>>
>>
>>
>> Cons:
>>
>>    1. Unlicensed.  Might fight other noise out there, and even quiet
>>    links now might have noise later
>>    2. Not as familiar with this tool set as we are with Mimosa, although
>>    this isn’t a big consideration as we have worked with lots of Ubiquiti
>>    products
>>    3. Cost of HD is pretty high for an unlicensed link
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are some questions we are hoping for help with:
>>
>>    1. How much room in the unlicensed band is there to move channels if
>>    you see other noise out there?   We have been looking but are finding it
>>    tough to figure out if we run wide channels, and see noise, will we be 
>> able
>>    to move to other channels.
>>    2. Is it reasonable to think you can push 1.2 aggregate IP traffic
>>    across any of the three options B11, AF24 or AF24HD?   Seems like a well
>>    planned link with great line of site at 6 miles should be able to, but
>>    looking for some real world experience.
>>    3. Any oddball items we should take into consideration other than the
>>    ones already mentioned here? Or are we missing some obvious questions?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> David Coudron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Gino A. Villarini*
>> President
>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>
>
>

Reply via email to