Its still in fact finding stage right now, so thats all up in the air. Not NCIS meets Mr Robot. Caveats being masking private property, Plate Identification, I have no idea about the retention time required (that in itself may be a deal breaker, since I assume once a municipality records something there is a mandatory retention period) Red light type cameras, if they werent so hated dont seem terrible, but I dont believe they focus out further than the intersection. Ill look at that Onssi. Im betting this ultimately becomes a nonstarter
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> wrote: > We work with Onssi for a large government customer. Are you talking about > recording? Managing the cameras? > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> vendor OT responses appreciated >> >> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Anyone here ever been involved in citywide surveillance? >>> A starting point being 4x intersection cameras. >>> 1984 being a good jump off point. >>> >>> Whats kind of system would cover roughly 8.5 square miles? (relatively >>> minute in city size) >>> This is multiple thousands of cameras. >>> Pretty sure there isnt a ubnt unifi solution of that scale. >>> Anybody dealt with that? Assuming that the overall system would catch an >>> in morion plate and have a tax payer freindly masking option? >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Carl Peterson > > *PORT NETWORKS* > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=401+E+Pratt+St,+Ste+2553%0D+Baltimore,+MD+21202%0D+(410&entry=gmail&source=g> > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=401+E+Pratt+St,+Ste+2553%0D+Baltimore,+MD+21202%0D+(410&entry=gmail&source=g> > > (410) 637-3707 >
