We do have an OTT option for those that are interested, no locals and no DVR 
but a OTT option for the other channels which can be done via VPN.  

Layne Sisk
801.426.8283, ext 102


-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 3:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV

Also. This makes real Choice an IPTV solution not an OTT solution. 

We need a cost effective OTT solution. 

> On Feb 23, 2018, at 17:18, Keefe John <keefe...@ethoplex.com> wrote:
> Unless you're getting a short wave most long-distance layer2 connections are 
> going to be MPLS over layer3 anyways.  So how's that different than a VPN or 
> GRE tunnel?
> Keefe
>> On 2/23/2018 3:56 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>> That is not by choice.  The content providers all have a different tolerance 
>> as to how their product is piped around.  RealChoice could drop it and 
>> probably ship the product over the public internet and never get caught, 
>> however they risk losing channels if they ever get caught.
>> Not sure what their current deal is, when I was working with them I was 
>> trying to get the programmers to allow content via VPN or VLAN over VPN 
>> (silly, right)  over the public internet.  Some of them were OK with it.
>> -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hoppes
>> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:46 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RodeoTV vs. RealChoice TV
>> RealChoice would be a great option if they would drop their private line 
>> requirement.
>>> On Feb 23, 2018, at 15:39, Clint Wiley <cl...@hagerstownfiber.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I wanted to see if any of you are offering IPTV to your customers. If so, 
>>> are any of you using either RodeoTV or RealChoice TV as the wholesale 
>>> provider? Can any of you provide feedback, thoughts, experiences, etc. on 
>>> either provider?
>>> Thanks,
>>> _________________________
>>> Clint Wiley
>>> Hagerstown Fiber Internet

Reply via email to