I have never used temp compensation.  And I have put lotsa batts in un 
airconditioned and un heated shelters.
I think the lack of HVAC kills them much more than temp co charging voltages.  

From: Adam Moffett 
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 6:56 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Traco BCMU360 24 or 48v

How much is enough to matter?

Without temperature compensation you're undercharging all winter and 
overcharging all summer.  My understanding is that's going to permanently 
reduce your capacity.  

Even if you have climate control, the battery makes heat when charging and 
discharging, so if you tape the sensor to the positive terminal you can benefit 
from temperature compensation even if the room is always 70 degrees.



------ Original Message ------
From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
To: "af" <[email protected]>
Sent: 4/3/2018 5:27:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Traco BCMU360 24 or 48v

  I didn't realize the BCMU had temperature controlled charging... that would 
be an advantage, but if you have it in a box with a power supply, switch and 
such, it's going to stay pretty warm in the winter anyway... we don't heat or 
cool any of our boxes, and the majority don't even have ventilation, and I 
haven't seen any real problems with just using a static float voltage. It may 
lose us a bit of battery life and/or capacity, but I don't see that it's enough 
to matter.


  On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> wrote:

    The one thing that worries me about using the DR-UPS40 is that it doesn't 
have temperature controlled charging like BCMU does. So we would have to set 
one charging voltage that is static which will be under voltage in the winter 
and over voltage cooking the batteries in the summer when the box is hot. We 
don't heat or cool our boxes so I was looking for something with a little more 
control of the float voltage with the temperature differences we have. I also 
would like to only use one battery instead of two. 



    On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

      I'm the Netonix would be doing any voltage up/down conversion you'd need 
to do in that setup anyway, so I don't really see much advantage to 24v vs 48v 
one way or the other.


      In a setup like that, I'd personally just use the Meanwell SDR-240-24 
with a Meanwell DR-UPS40, and do 24v batteries, instead of using the BCMU-360. 
You need two batteries instead of one then, but it's cheaper and doesn't have 
the issues Paul mentioned. 


      I don't have any experience with the Tycon webmonitor, but I definitely 
can recommend using a SiteMonitor. 


      On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:

        Be aware that the BCMU-360 does the following:



        Only sustains at 240w

        Only outputs about 45v when running on batteries.  We have started 
using a step up kit to bring it back to 48v+ 



        Paul



        From: Af <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Darin Steffl
        Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 4:50 PM
        To: [email protected]; [email protected]
        Subject: [AFMUG] Traco BCMU360 24 or 48v



        Hey guys,



        We're looking at fine tuning our DC power solution for sites using more 
than 75w of power.



        We're setting in with using the Traco BCMU-360 with a Meanwell 
SDR-240-24 or 48 volts power supply.



        If we're using the Traco UPS unit, is there any advantage to using 24v 
vs 48v power supply? It will only be powering a Netonix DC switch and the BCMU 
only needs a 12v battery.



        Also, we're looking at SiteMonitor to monitor the battery voltage and 
grid power as well. Do you recommend this or the Tycon webmonitor (TPDIN)?



        Thanks




        -- 

        Darin Steffl

        Minnesota WiFi

        www.mnwifi.com

        507-634-WiFi

         Like us on Facebook






    -- 

    Darin Steffl 
    Minnesota WiFi
    www.mnwifi.com
    507-634-WiFi
     Like us on Facebook

Reply via email to