Because you haven’t convinced them not to, or it crosses state lines. Mark
> On Apr 24, 2018, at 11:20 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Then why is my upstream provider charging me USF fee on my broadband only > connection? > > From: Af <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 8:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing > > Just 477 > > The reclassification didn’t change the USF status of information services, > and by the same token it’s repeal didn’t change it’s status. > > USF is based on voice service and some interstate data circuits. > > > Mark Radabaugh > WISPA FCC Committee Chair > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 419-261-5996 > > On Apr 24, 2018, at 9:31 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Ok, sorry, so I've been extremely busy this year and missed the fact that the > FCC once again re-classified us in January 2018 as a Service Provider instead > of a Telecommunications Provider. Therefor exempting us from filing 499A/Q > and having to pay into the FUSF fund if we are only providing internet, not > VoIP/Telephone services. > > Is that correct? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of > Sterling Jacobson > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 6:47 PM > To: '[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [AFMUG] FCC USF and 499 Filing > > So now I'm digging to this more to make sure I'm on the right track. > > ALL broadband/internet ISP providers are now classified Telecommunications > providers and must file FCC 499a or 499q and pay USF if not de-minimus? > > Is this where we all stand now? > >
