Ok, So DFS?
If your antenna/dish gains are set correctly in each link at each end setting correct power level should be a breeze. Reflections from your own link can cause events to occur if this is not set correctly. Also, Ensure there are no other overlapping links or nearby radios on the same or near channel.

2cents



On 05/30/2018 03:56 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
This is interesting. I definitely want to be in compliance, but I also know that these detection are 100% false. We have redundant AP's on the same tower mounted at the same height pointing the same direction, but 20mhz apart, and they don't trip DFS. It's like there is a magical packet or multipath event that causes this. We may have to give 15.0.2 a try.

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:48 PM Darren Shea <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I’ll vouch for Sean’s experience on these – we also had to roll
    back a bunch of DFS 15.1-15.1.3 APs to 15.0.2 to deal with a
    ridiculous level of false radar detections. I haven’t yet tried
    15.1.5 on any of those, but there wasn’t any indication they dealt
    with that in release notes.

    nDarren

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
    *Sent:* Wednesday, May 30, 2018 3:45 PM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Epmp vs 450 - DFS events

    15.0.2 is the least finicky with DFS.  above that cambium changed
    the code to be more restrictive to meet new FCC rules (or
    something like that)

    On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Eric Muehleisen
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    If someone has the holy grail on what firmware for reducing DFS on
    450. I'd love to hear it. We are on 15.1.1 and the false DFS hits
    are killing us lately. See attached. This is one AP for the past
    couple days. It's been terrible around here.

    DFS_450.png

    On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:35 PM [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        ​For ePMP it depends on the version number. 2.6.2.1 had very
        stable DFS performance and for APs where we saw issues, we
        have left

        it there. Some links are working fine on the latest firmware
        though.​

        On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:50 PM, George Skorup
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        wrote:

        My experience is exactly the opposite here. ePMP seems more
        sensitive to DFS events. By far.

        On 5/30/2018 12:25 PM, Gino A. Villarini wrote:

        Anyone noticed that apparently the Epmp radios are less prone
        to DFS events? Im assuming most are false caused by RF
        interference, but I see way less events on Epmp than on 450�
        Will have to do a side by side study.�

        �

        /*Gino A. Villarini*/

        President

        Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968

        *Error! Filename not specified.*


--

Reply via email to