Why not just make a PMP450i lite connectorized AP?
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Matt Mangriotis <[email protected]> wrote: > Very good question George… > > > > I am trying to gauge interest. Some folks would prefer that they are using > the same equipment throughout the network, and we don’t really have an > option right now for a lower priced (shorter range) but high throughput > extension of the network, but still a 450. Same SMs, etc… > > > > Really wondering if many folks can’t complete a certain percentage of > installs due to obstructions (foliage) using 5 GHz, but could utilize an > “under the canopy” type of solution to light up a neighborhood. Is that a > really common situation? How common? > > > > Any feedback is welcome, and I value your guys’ opinions (more than some > others)… > > > > Matt > > > > From: Af <[email protected]> On Behalf Of George Skorup > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:48 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ External ] Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > > > Ok, I guess I have to be the one to say this. Why would we want a 450-based > micro-POP product when we have ePMP? Just askin'. > > On 6/7/2018 10:29 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote: > > I would really like to get your opinions on this topic� would a 450 device > like this help you in your network? > > � > > Now�s you chance to comment and help direct us! > > � > > Please fill out the short survey and add any other info you�d like.� > It�s only 16 questions. > > � > > Matt > > � > > From: Af <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ray Savich > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:08 AM > To: '[email protected]' <[email protected]> > Subject [AFMUG] Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey > > � > > Add your input to the Cambium Networks MicroPOP survey. > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CambiumMicroPOP > > � > > � > > Join the Conversation > > Cambium Networks Community Forum > > � > >
