Apologies for the incorrect Subject line.

el

On 2022-09-22 22:57 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Some thoughts on the session:
> 
>       Basically most of the session time was wasted with
>       approximately 10 addresses by the usual suspects all of which
>       had the same content, namely exactly zero.
> 
>       This is not new, it has been unchanged approximately since I
>       have attended the first meeting many years ago.
> 
>       The only exception was Alan Barrett who then however faced
>       headwind for making the practical and good suggestion of
>       clients to engage their providers if and when these do not
>       provide Universal Access.
> 
>       Several speakers (in particular the (outgoing African) Board
>       Members who should have ample opportunity to actually do
>       something about it (but NEVER do)) pontificated about how
>       important it would be to have ICANN Meetings in Africa.
> 
>       While I am all in favor of that, in particular in Namibia, the
>       Chair wasted the opportunity to engage ICANN's CEO on this,
>       which had to be done by Sébastien Bachollet and even in
>       English, pointing out that one of the reasons to create the
>       smaller ICANN (policy) meetings was to have reduced
>       requirements in oder to be able to hold meetings in developing
>       countries.
> 
>       Of course he was fobbed off, and, in a manner which I consider
>       bordering the line of ICANN's Standards of Acceptable
>       Behavior.
> 
>       The point is not that we need to have meetings in all ICANN
>       regions and in particular in Africa, which we do, and we all
>       know that, the question is why ICANN is not doing it or
>       anything about it?
> 
>       Well, I think, this is because the "paying" stakeholders do
>       not wish to meet in less than 5 star environments close to
>       major airports, let alone transit.
> 
>       This US-centricity which is patently obvious in so many ICANN
>       aspects is, in my view, not compatible with the multi
>       stakeholder model.
> 
>       Fortunately there was no time to review or even debate the
>       "statement", which mostly nobody reads, but most certainly is
>       never acted upon.
> 
> greetings, el

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse   \         /       Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
[email protected]             / *      |  Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht  \      /  If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia           ;____/  Sect 20 of Act No 4 of 2019 may apply

_______________________________________________
AfrICANN mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/africann

Reply via email to