Hi Daniel,
At 04:59 22-01-2016, Daniel Shaw wrote:
Hello again! :-)
:-)
Am I missing something here? Or is this inline comment unrelated to
anything else in the post it's replying to? I don't get it...
It's old stuff. :-)
If you (or anyone on the list) have any specific questions I'll be
happy to answer them. AFRINIC's IPv6 implementation is pretty
straightforward. Of course AFRINIC is not a large ISP or Campus. As
such, we're fortunate in that our network needs are not very
complex. We have a handful of vlans for various purposes within a
give site. The IPv4 address plan allocates different sized subnets
based on the needs of the vlan, but for IPv6 it's much easier. We
have the standard /48 per site, and out of that we allocate a single
/64 per VLAN.
Nishal and I did the IPv6 implementation for AfriNIC.
So to summarise:
- Upstream providers we use are dual-stack.
- We don't do NAT, and have an IPv4 end-user assignment that meets our needs.
- Address planning is kept simple and standard - IPv6 /48 per
site/ASN, /64 per vlan.
- Dual-stack everything everywhere all the time, unless simply not possible.
Again, as a small corporate network, plus a small hosting network
for our services, that's all we need. We don't have very complex requirements.
I suggested previously that it would be useful to share the details
by publishing a document about it on the web. It's up to AfriNIC to
see whether it wants to cover more than IP addressing in the document.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
