On 26 January 2016 at 11:53, Mark Elkins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:05 +0400, Mukom Akong T. wrote: > > Locally, this would carry much more weight if AFRINIC was behind the > site and may mean the difference between success and failure. >
The weight should be a reflection of the capability of the trainer/consultant. AFRINIC should only be endorsing a capability that you've already proven. > > > > > Anyone can claim to be a consultant and your credibility in that role > > has to be more than just your name on some list. > > True, so they must be some sort of member (even an Associate Member), > have access to IPv6 (have the Consultant Signup only accessible via > IPv6?) and list an IPv6 website they can be traced to. > None of the above are indicators of ability/competence as a trainer or consultant. However, your contributions to the wiki & mailing list on a topic could be better proxies for your competence. -- Mukom Akong T. LinkedIn:Mukom <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mukom> | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ “When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
