On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:16:20AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 13/May/16 08:02, Daniel Shaw wrote: > > > I doubt it. You really want to avoid NAT64 - and so far you have not > > given any good reason you would need it :) > > How do you expect IPv6-only hosts to speak to IPv4-only resources? >
Well, that would be a valid "good reason". I didn't think that was *very* clear from the very very first post. But subsequent posts and a 2nd reading made me understand that was the OP's intended use-case. - Daniel _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
