> On 20 Jun 2016, at 10:32 PM, Carlos M. Martinez <[email protected]> wrote: > > As a data point, in our network we: > > - do run both SLAAC and DHCPv6 > - we send RDNSS info over SLAAC > - we do provide both IPv4 and IPv6 DNSes via DHCP (v4 and v6 respectively) > > Now it’s less so as we’ve been upgrading machines, but we used to get a > significant amount of AAAA queries over v4 coming mostly from Windows > machines. > > I don’t think running both SLAAC and DHCPv6 is a big deal. It’s weird, and it > goes against one’s sense of ‘what should be right’, but in practice, it’s not > really a problem.
Basically +1 to all points above, apart from not yet bothering to send RDNSS info over SLAAC. But we also run both. But mostly +1 to the last line - that was what I was getting at with my question. While it “feels” a bit “weird” there is really no problem. - Daniel _______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
