On 26/Oct/16 11:36, Saul Stein wrote:
> > > > > I guess this is a fairly standard response. So this is the perception > that we need to change. The key being no ADVANTAGE… > > Does anyone know of any short articles that have been produced to > counter this type of argument? Cases where 6to4 natting won’t work etc? > Firstly, if you are running 6to4, more annoyance to you :-). But I imagine you meant NAT64... The business justification makes it the right thing to do. Simply, do you want to keep moving bits on the Internet (or an internet) in the (near?) future? To be honest, if we cannot find a way to drum that in, then I'm okay with watching those companies that do not want to deploy IPv6 become less competitive and fall away, purely for that reason alone. Mark.
_______________________________________________ AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
