--On Tuesday, May 06, 2008 02:04:52 PM -0400 Matt Benjamin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My current draft has a bunch of motivation for doing all this in the
first place, but if it's not viewed as important (perhaps because
there's consensus there),
Motivation is a suitable topic for such a document. Further, if there is
consensus on something, removing it for that reason sort of misses the
point.
I have been trying to get point feedback so what is proposed in the
draft reflects intuitions of people I know have ideas and usually share
them--not short circuit the opportunity for others to comment.
That's fine, but bear in mind that more frequent drafts often promote
discussion more effectively than trying to get everything right in the
first draft. I've seen IETF documents go through dozens of drafts before
being done. Of course, those generally have more contributors than I think
we have here.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
