On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:05 PM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. The IETF is not interested in another file system to standardize. >> The actively developed IETF distributed file system protocols are > NFSv4, >> WebDAV, and SCP. > > I think that's a matter of opinion, but Simon's proposal is adequate to > the day. We can at least publish it and move forward as opposed to > debating it interminably. Moving it into a WG can be done later if > considered desirable.
I take it the further discussion which is transpiring is not in opposition to this point: there is critical mass to move on *this*, regardless of whether something else happens later. I'm not really seeing value or particularly much weight *now* behind trying to get this into the standardization process *now*, given the resources which are likely to be available soon to work on this. To that end... is there any disagreement with the above point, that Simon's proposal is reasonable and actionable? Derrick _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
