-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

To try to get consensus on this minor point, I'm prepared to change the
published names of these constants (with apologies to Derrick, because I
prefer having some fun in the code too, and liked these)...

If folks not heard from have opinions, I'd request they chime in?

Thanks,

Matt

Derrick Brashear wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Steven Jenkins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Matt Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>>> Nb., recent reviewers, I've left the names of AFSCB_Cancel_LostMyMind
>>> and AFSCB_Cancel_IHateYou as previously defined, by request of the author.
>>>
>> I suggest that we change those two names as follows:
>>
>> AFSCB_Cancel_LostMyMind to AFSCB_Cancel_OutOfCallbacks
>> AFSCB_Cancel_IHateYou to AFSCB_Cancel_RevokedByAdmin
> 
> I disagree. The names accurately and adequately display intent and are
> never visible to users anyway, only
> to implementors.



- --

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJEIWvJiSUUSaRdSURCDO+AJ0fgGYQzv4UVqXnk4bx6yOslTJchQCeLlzq
a/v9GXK84/SPOYFfjHXLK3Y=
=EkAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization

Reply via email to