On 19 Jun 2009, at 22:49, Andrew Deason wrote:
The format resembles what Jeffrey posted as an example earlier, but I
separated the affected RPCs according to what underlying struct
changed
in the RPC (if any); I just found it easier to follow. This is
what's in
the parentheses by "Affected RPCs". Some RPCs are listed more than
once
because of this: once for each structure changed. I also merged some
fields into the same section when the list of affected RPCs was
identical.
This format seems reasonable to me. I've started a summary at
http://www.dementia.org/twiki/bin/view/AFSLore/RpcRefresh
which I'll endeavour to keep up to date as things develop here.
Who's next?
S.
_______________________________________________
AFS3-standardization mailing list
[email protected]
http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
