Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> writes: > As for whether or not "the number of ack packets that have been delayed > due to excessive aborts" should be sent or not, I wonder if that number > is really a useful number from the perspective of debugging the server > state. From my perspective the question that one is trying to answer is > whether or not a particular rx_connection or rx_peer is being throttled. > I don't think reporting the number of delays will help address that > question.
I just had a file server fail with symptoms that may be related to a particular client pounding on it and may be related to a problem with the file server itself. If I had this statistic available, I could have seen if the culprit appeared to be user programs trying to access directories that they aren't permitted to access, or whether something else was causing the problem. It would have provided some clarity. I agree that having this information per-connection is better than having it per-server, but having *some* information about the frequency of this problem would be nice. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
