Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> writes: > Derrick Brashear wrote:
>> Actually, it's not. >> >> ttl = (p[0] << 24) | (p[1] << 16) | (p[2] << 8) | p[3]; >> p += 4; /* Skip the TTL */ >> >> ... >> if (!minttl || ttl < minttl) >> minttl = ttl; >> ... >> acellInfo->timeout = minttl ? (time(0) + minttl) : 0; > Even better. There is nothing to say or fix. :-) Wow, I'm surprised. I do think that it would be worthwhile to mention this explicitly in the draft, just because I didn't think of it and therefore other implementors might not. I'll try to come up with some language for that. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
