Am Montag, 1. Februar 2010 17:21:12 schrieb Andrew Deason: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:07:03 +0100 > > Christof Hanke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sadly, the same quota-fields are required for the fileserver in > > ( struct VolumeStatus and two others) as well, where we have no > > TLV-RFC yet. > > Do we really want to continue duplicating AFSVol volume information in > RXAFS? If we keep doing this, any change to volume info get/set looks > like it will need to be done twice, and I don't really see why we need > it in RXAFS... I believe the reason for this is that the openafs-binary "fs" should talk to the fileserver only, and "fs listquota" is a pretty popular command. Unless we find some kind of common interface-definition shared between fileserver and volserver, the answer is "yes", I'm afraid.
_______________________________________________ AFS3-standardization mailing list [email protected] http://michigan-openafs-lists.central.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
